METHODOLOGY
How District Zero decides
District Zero compares offers and adds context. This page explains how we use prices, availability and history — and when we prefer not to make a recommendation.
Facts → interpretation → verdict
Every verdict is built in three steps, never in reverse. First the facts: prices and availability our monitoring actually recorded across the stores we track. Then the interpretation: what those facts mean (supply is thinning, the price is below average…). Only then the verdict: what we would do in your place. Every verdict carries a "Show the evidence" control — the exact numbers it was built from. We never ask for blind trust.
Where the knowledge comes from
Tracked data
Measured by our own monitoring: prices, availability, restocks and history across the European stores we track. Always with scope and freshness. This is the default, unmarked source of every claim.
Editorial knowledge
Verifiable facts curated by District Zero humans — official release dates, product contents, store shipping terms. Carries a label.
Collector patterns
Collector experience: e.g. anniversary and limited lines have historically appreciated after release. Always labeled, never presented as measurements — and over time every pattern gets its own Academy article explaining it.
The verdicts
What we never do
We never invent data. A claim without evidence simply isn't made.
We never sell verdicts. Affiliate relationships don't influence verdicts, rankings or the DZ Pick.
We never fake certainty. When the evidence isn't there, we stay silent.
We never hide our sources. Every verdict is auditable down to the numbers.
Market information — not investment advice. Verdicts are recomputed continuously from current tracked data. Monitored stores →